PARADISE WITHIN Essays - Jules Laforgue, Afterlife, Paradise

PARADISE WITHIN The search for paradise is the neverending struggle through life for sanctum and inner-peace. While the knowledge of a single religion can cause doubts of afterlife, the contrast between two culturally diverse beliefs complicates matters even more; possibly to the point of enlightenment that one man's heaven is another man's hell. Likewise, the film, BlackRobe, plays on the similarities between Chomina, the Huron indian tribe leader, and Father LaForgue, the French Jesuit preist and the ultimate respect they gain for one another despite their cultural and religious diffferences. One must always show respect before one can expect to receive it however these circumstances come about. Chomina and Father LaForgue shared the common bond of commitment to a promise. This is what created the underlying conflict between the two. Chomina had promised to deliver Father LaForgue to his destiny (a missionary camp set up by other French preist), while at the same time, Chomina had to stand up for his own cultural beliefs and life-style. On the other hand, LaForgue devotes himself to his god, country, and the battle to save the souls of these poor Huron savages. Both of their constant efforts to keep their commitments created much friction between the two, and posed problems of doubt to them. There was one main factor that lead to Chomina and LaForgue's understanding of one another. Chomina's daughter, Annuka, and Father LaForgue's younger assistant Daniel crossed cultural, racial and religious barriers with their love for one another. LaForgue did not understand why Daniel could love some- one so religiously biased. What LaForgue finally sees is that love for someone should not be based upon such trivial concepts such as a spiritual opinion. Chomina also sees this when Daniel continues to follow the tribe after their abandonment. This then causes them to see that love conquers all differences through the quality of the promises they both make to one another. Both men knew and finally came to grips with their destiny and inevitable downfalls. Because deep down inside they knew what they had to do. Chomina knew his demise was coming through the repitition of his dream where the raven pecked out his eyes on a snow covered island. Not until his end did he see this was his fate. Not unlike Chomina, Father LaForgue knew his fate was also tragic. His mother had told him that she would not see him ever again. These two scenarios are similar due to the fact that the end was near, but neither could make real sense of the actual events. Despite the tragedies that occured along their way, much insight and enlightenment was acquired by all involved parties. Presumabley, this can be summed up by the saying, "There's what's right, and there's what's right, and never the 'tween shall meet".

Washington Views on Factions essays

Washington Views on Factions essays George Washington is the most well-known American in history. The first president of the United States, his portrait has graced the quarter and the one-dollar bill. Our capital city and even a state have borrowed his name. After Washingtons second term as president, he decided not to run for a third term. He wanted to leave the country with some words of wisdom in hopes of guiding the country to longevity without his supervision. One of the most important ideas Washington offered to the country in his Final Address was to stay away from factions. Washington says that although factions are inseperable from our nature, they should be avoided (Farewell Address). Parties form because not only is it human nature to congregate with people of similar interests, but also because a group is more likely to change something in government than a single person is. In Washingtons cabinet, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton constantly feuded because of differing views on the economy and the role of government in general. Washington must surely have realized that parties were forming; it prompted him to write about them in his Farewell Address. Washington thought of the divisions in government in different ways; one way was of sectional disunion. Washington urges that the public should indignantly frown upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our Country from the rest, or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts (Farewell Address). He then speaks of the fact that any kind of sectional thoughts could be harmful to every part of the country. Washington says that the North depends on the South for food, while the South depends on the North for ships to transport their goods. In addition to this, Washington says the West needs goods provided by the East, and the East needs wood from the West (Farewell Address). If any of the sections of the ...